Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 22:32:53 05/11/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 00:49:51, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 11, 2001 at 22:13:23, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On May 11, 2001 at 16:04:40, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 11, 2001 at 15:10:30, Chris Taylor wrote: >>> >>>>I ran this 6 ply tournament. On a PIII 733, and used Nunn Test, then all play >>>>all. >>>>It was a collection of Chessbase/Fritz compatable programs. >>>>I was curious to see what would happen? I used ELOStat version 1.1b by >>>>Frank Schubert to analyse the results. >>>>What has suprised me is the result of Hiarcs, version 6 and 7.32.... >>> >>> >>>I do not see a reason to be surprised. >>>It is known that hiarcs can see deeper than the opponents at the same depth >>>because it does more extensions. >>> >>>I believe that Junior6 can also get a very good result if you add it to your >>>tournament. >> >> >>I believe Junior will get crushed. Remember that a "ply" to junior is not >>the same as a ply to everyone else. 6 plies to junior should compare to 3 >>normal plies for most programs... That would lead to trouble... > >When I ask the chessbase engines to play tournament at fixed depth of x plies it >give depth 2x-1 for Junior and not depth x. > >Uri Then that is _also_ bogus. Junior plies are not exactly normal plies * 2. The bottom line is that this is worthless. Interesting for the same program at different plies, but worthless otherwise.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.