Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 09:36:24 05/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 11, 2001 at 16:04:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 11, 2001 at 15:10:30, Chris Taylor wrote: > >>I ran this 6 ply tournament. On a PIII 733, and used Nunn Test, then all play >>all. >>It was a collection of Chessbase/Fritz compatable programs. >>I was curious to see what would happen? I used ELOStat version 1.1b by >>Frank Schubert to analyse the results. >>What has suprised me is the result of Hiarcs, version 6 and 7.32.... > > >I do not see a reason to be surprised. >It is known that hiarcs can see deeper than the opponents at the same depth >because it does more extensions. > >I believe that Junior6 can also get a very good result if you add it to your >tournament. > >Junior is supposed to get better result if you increase the depthes. >I am not sure if it can win at 6 plies but I am almost sure that Junior is going >to win your tournament if you do fixed depth of 9 plies. > >If you do a tournament at 1,2 or 3 plies then Junior has no chance against >hiarcs. > >Uri You were right with your comments about Junior. It shows depth=11. At a 6ply search? Bob was also right in his comments, as Junior and Hiarcs takes in some cases minutes to make a move. From this fact it is of no suprise to me to see Junior ending up with a massive win over all programs. In such a one sided contest. Well, now I know! Chris
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.