Author: Chris Carson
Date: 14:00:43 05/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 16:28:51, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On May 12, 2001 at 16:23:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On May 12, 2001 at 16:11:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>In my opinion no program can - on tournament level 40/120 - get more than 2300 >>>ELO against solid human players. The shorter the time control the higher the >>>perfomance of the computer programs. And by the way, the SSDF list is at least >>>about 200-300 ELO too high. >>>Kurt >> >>Then how did DJ6 score 2703 against Human Gm's??? >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Study the games, and you will not much see of what I understand about soldid >playing. As already mentioned earlier I still get about 30 % against the >monsters without using any anti computer strategy. And this should simply not be >possible for a player with about 2000 ELO? > >Regards >Kurt No offense Kurt, but I have not seen any published games by you from official arbitrated events at 40/2 that would support this claim. :) If you can set up an event with a recognized arbitrator against the program/designated operator (the programmer can decide who is qualified), then the results would hold. Again, no offense, but I could easily post hundreds of pgn's here that I claim were losses by some program when in reality I get get killed most of the time. I need something more solid to believe this claim. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.