Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:17:34 05/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 16:26:55, Chris Carson wrote: >On May 12, 2001 at 16:11:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>In my opinion no program can - on tournament level 40/120 - get more than 2300 >>ELO against solid human players. The shorter the time control the higher the >>perfomance of the computer programs. And by the way, the SSDF list is at least >>about 200-300 ELO too high. >>Kurt > >You have a right to your opinion, however, how do you account fot the >ratings above 2300 at 40/2 by the programs (180+ games)? > >Best Regards, >Chris Carson I know that arnold hasidovski got 3 draws against computers in the Israeli league and his rating was only almost 2200. It will be interesting to find the weakest human in human-human games who can beat chess programs in a match. I hope to see a company invites everyone to play against their program in the following conditions: 1)The players should pay 200$ for playing a match of 6 games at tournament time control. 2)The players get 2000$ if they win the match and 1000$ if they draw the match. The idea is to attract only weak players in human-human games who believe that they can beat the program. I guess that the money is not enough to convince the strong GM's and is not enough to convince weaker players unless they believe they have practical chance to get at least 3-3 against the program. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.