Author: Chris Carson
Date: 14:22:08 05/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 17:17:34, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 12, 2001 at 16:26:55, Chris Carson wrote: > >>On May 12, 2001 at 16:11:09, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>In my opinion no program can - on tournament level 40/120 - get more than 2300 >>>ELO against solid human players. The shorter the time control the higher the >>>perfomance of the computer programs. And by the way, the SSDF list is at least >>>about 200-300 ELO too high. >>>Kurt >> >>You have a right to your opinion, however, how do you account fot the >>ratings above 2300 at 40/2 by the programs (180+ games)? >> >>Best Regards, >>Chris Carson > >I know that arnold hasidovski got 3 draws against computers in the Israeli >league and his rating was only almost 2200. > >It will be interesting to find the weakest human in human-human games who can >beat chess programs in a match. > >I hope to see a company invites everyone to play against their program in the >following conditions: > >1)The players should pay 200$ for playing a match of 6 games at tournament time >control. >2)The players get 2000$ if they win the match and 1000$ if they draw the match. > >The idea is to attract only weak players in human-human games who believe that >they can beat the program. > >I guess that the money is not enough to convince the strong GM's and is not >enough to convince weaker players unless they believe they have practical chance >to get at least 3-3 against the program. > >Uri That is an interesting idea, I myself would enter that. :) However, I think you would still get some strong local players (NM, FM, IM's and maybe local GM's), but that might not be a bad thing. :) Best Regards, Chris Carson
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.