Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:27:34 04/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 1998 at 03:10:44, Jouni Uski wrote: >I think Mats's posting are nonsense! If Fritz5 beats all opponents it >doesn't >matter any if moves are found by speed or knowledge. Remember Deep >Blue's >victory over Kasparov - speed was of course the main reason for fine >performance. There is no VICTORY of Deep Blue over Kasparov. A lousy program won against a misadvised and frightened grandpa-kasparov. Kasparov needs psychology. He needs an opponent he can impress with his faces and endless groaning. Also he was not allowed to take back one move as against the polgars. So what could he do than to lose ? Other IM's would have played better against Deep Blue. The 2nd game was the beginning. The rest of the games were pure nonsense. In the end he played like a beginner. He was completely broken. It was not Deep Blue making BRILLIANT moves, it was Kasparov having trained too much with ChessBase products and talked to much with ChessBase people and - of course - too many lobbsters.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.