Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik vs. Deep Fritz (anyone planning a counter demonstration)?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 18:45:40 05/12/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 12, 2001 at 15:26:13, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>On May 12, 2001 at 14:43:12, Chris Kantack wrote:
>
>>I guess I'm on the side that Kramnik (having access to Deep Fritz months ahead
>>of time), will have little trouble winning the match.   Indeed, he may be able
>>to play the entire match with 99% of the moves already "practiced".
>
>I doubt that Kramnik has an 8 processor cpu at home so he cannot "prepare"
>anything unless he own or have access to identical hardware. On an 8 processor
>cpu it would be a whole different game as to just playing against a dual or
>single cpu, the program running on 8 processors would look deeper and come up
>with bettter moves!


You do realize that you can give the program 5-6 times longer per move, and
achieve the _same_ search depth you would get with 8 cpus?  :)



>>
>>I don't frequent this site often.  I was wondering if anyone is planning a
>>similar or counter-demonstration.   What I'd like to see is another Master or
>>GrandMaster, perform their own little match against Deep Fritz at the same time
>>as Kramnik's match.   Allow this player the same advanced access to the program
>>that Kramnik will have.
>
>Well i would like to see that aswell, but unless you come up with a contract
>that would attract a sponsor with a similar price bag and an 8 processor cpu i
>don't see that happening, besides from the ethical point of view: imagine that
>prior to the braingames event where Kasparov put his title it stake for the
>world championship, someone got the idea to do the same with to different
>players, different sponsors before the braingames event took off!?
>>
>>My bet; It would be an easy win for this other Master as well.  Indeed, this
>>Master or GrandMaster could probably destroy Deep Fritz whereas Kramnik will
>>probably keep "things close" to make it look good.
>
>it is nice to know that all the GM losses to programs in recent(and past years)
>are only a result of GM's being "nice" to the programs in order to make it look
>good lol ;-)
>
>Regards
>Jonas
>>
>>
>>Chris Kantack
>>http://home.earthlink.net/~kantack/lcdchess/home.htm



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.