Author: Peter Berger
Date: 23:26:28 05/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 20:56:36, stuart taylor wrote: > >These results also make Chesstiger 2 look as weak as an amatuer program, or some >very old outdated program. >Why is this? That, for me is a much bigger question! >S.Taylor Have a look at http://icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?169234 , Stuart . I think that Chess Tiger 14.0 really doesn't know more about solving the CCR positions than Genius 2 . It's very clear that in general playing strength Chess Tiger is at least one class stronger though. Same with Fritz btw. It might be also a design decision . A lot of the positions would usually be "found" with the opening book - although I think this doesn't make them less valid ; with minor changes very similar positions may well arise in games when the program ´has to face them without the help of an opening book . The best one definitely was Deep Shredder so far ; it solved many and the few it didn't solve would have all been chosen by opening book . pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.