Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 00:02:26 05/13/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 12, 2001 at 21:45:40, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On May 12, 2001 at 15:26:13, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On May 12, 2001 at 14:43:12, Chris Kantack wrote: >> >>>I guess I'm on the side that Kramnik (having access to Deep Fritz months ahead >>>of time), will have little trouble winning the match. Indeed, he may be able >>>to play the entire match with 99% of the moves already "practiced". >> >>I doubt that Kramnik has an 8 processor cpu at home so he cannot "prepare" >>anything unless he own or have access to identical hardware. On an 8 processor >>cpu it would be a whole different game as to just playing against a dual or >>single cpu, the program running on 8 processors would look deeper and come up >>with bettter moves! > > >You do realize that you can give the program 5-6 times longer per move, and >achieve the _same_ search depth you would get with 8 cpus? :) Yes i do, but i doubt that kramnik will do that. > > > >>> >>>I don't frequent this site often. I was wondering if anyone is planning a >>>similar or counter-demonstration. What I'd like to see is another Master or >>>GrandMaster, perform their own little match against Deep Fritz at the same time >>>as Kramnik's match. Allow this player the same advanced access to the program >>>that Kramnik will have. >> >>Well i would like to see that aswell, but unless you come up with a contract >>that would attract a sponsor with a similar price bag and an 8 processor cpu i >>don't see that happening, besides from the ethical point of view: imagine that >>prior to the braingames event where Kasparov put his title it stake for the >>world championship, someone got the idea to do the same with to different >>players, different sponsors before the braingames event took off!? >>> >>>My bet; It would be an easy win for this other Master as well. Indeed, this >>>Master or GrandMaster could probably destroy Deep Fritz whereas Kramnik will >>>probably keep "things close" to make it look good. >> >>it is nice to know that all the GM losses to programs in recent(and past years) >>are only a result of GM's being "nice" to the programs in order to make it look >>good lol ;-) >> >>Regards >>Jonas >>> >>> >>>Chris Kantack >>>http://home.earthlink.net/~kantack/lcdchess/home.htm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.