Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 13:51:59 04/14/98
Go up one level in this thread
On April 14, 1998 at 16:34:33, Amir Ban wrote: >On April 14, 1998 at 12:21:04, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On April 13, 1998 at 12:56:46, Thoralf Karlsson wrote: >> >>>So far SSDF hasn't had a chance to put CST on the list. The reason is >>>that we don't have the program. We would like to test CST, especially >>>now when you report good result for it. If you are interested, please >>>contact me and I'll give you my address. >>> >>>Thoralf Karlsson >>>SSDF >> >>I have an answer from chris concerning this topic... >> >>he said: >> >>BTW tell Thoralf he can't have any CSTals. >> >>1. I don't agree with bean-counting >> >>2. The test methodology is flawed via autoplayers, possible cheating, >>and >>dirty tricks. >> >>3. I hate the slimy commercial scumbags who are fighting over the >>results. >> >>4. ELO lists miss out completely the essential nature of my creation. >> >>5. The ELO lists fanatics are materialist inadequates; and I don't wish >>to >>be any part of their nonsense. >> >>END of quote. >> >>Sorry Thoralf. >> >>Best wishes. >> >>Thorsten > > >Wow ! A chess program that considers playing games beneath its dignity ! >That's the best I've seen yet in human-like behavior. > >This is not CSTal. It's really CSFischer. And why would CST include an autoplayer device if not for autoplaying? Enrique >Say, Thoralf, what happened to the old SSDF practice of going to the >store, buying programs and playing with them, without asking anyone >anything ? Talking to programmers is not good for your mental health. > >Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.