Author: Christopher A. Morgan
Date: 09:27:28 05/15/01
Go up one level in this thread
I have played a lot of engine-engine, and engine tournaments in Fritz GUI on my Athlon 750 with 384MB RAM, generally using 64-128MB hash tables, and all tablebases up to five pieces, nearly 6 gig of Namilov tablebases. I have found that the generally recgonized stronger engine comes out with the best record (testing 30+ different engines). GT14 and GT2 regularly prevail against DF, F6 and others. In most cases GT14 and GT2 are clear winners by substancial margins. No doubt in my mind that they are the strongest programs out there today. Regards, Chris On May 14, 2001 at 16:59:32, john rice wrote: >Hello, >How reliable/accurate is the "engine vs engine" feature under the Fritz GUI? The >reason I ask is because I set up a few games between DF,CT14 and GT2 with the >following results: >(900mhz Athlon, 48m hashtable each, ponder off, 10'/10" games) > >Deep Fritz vs Chess Tiger 14: >0 wins, 7 loses, 4 draws > >Deep Fritz vs Gambit Tiger 2: >0 wins, 3 loses, 2 draws > >Chess Tiger 14 vs Gambit Tiger 2: >0 wins, 0 loses, 6 draws > >I was very surprised Deep Fritz didn't win a single game. Does this seem >possible? My guess is the "engine vs engine" feature is not very accurate. >JR
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.