Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:29:24 05/16/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2001 at 04:30:08, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >Not really interesting.Who cares? It´s only stupid blitzchess. I am sure that this is not the opinion of the programmer of tiger. He does not claim that tiger is optimized for long time control. The results are a surprise for me because I remmeber that I read at the rebelboard that the tigers did better results at fast time control(I do not remember the exact result but I remember that tiger got more than 50% against a some top programs including Junior6a,Fritz(I do not remember the exact version) and hiarcs7.32. I remmeber that the results were always more than 50% but at faster time control the % of tiger was bigger with the exception of hiarcs7.32 that is known to be relatively weak at long time control. The results suggested that tiger is clearly better than Deep Fritz at blitz when the difference becomes smaller at longer time control,there were no games at tournament time control so if we do interpulation it is not clear if tiger is better or worse than Deep Fritz at tournament time control. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.