Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: sorry not really interesting, only boring blitzchess

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 22:15:28 05/16/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 16, 2001 at 05:29:24, Uri Blass wrote:

>On May 16, 2001 at 04:30:08, Thomas Lagershausen wrote:
>
>>Not really interesting.Who cares? It´s only stupid blitzchess.


Hehe, for you, for me and some else, but MANY others seem to join it. =:-(


>The results suggested that tiger is clearly better than Deep Fritz at blitz when
>the difference becomes smaller at longer time control,there were no games at
>tournament time control so if we do interpulation it is not clear if tiger is
>better or worse than Deep Fritz at tournament time control.
>
>Uri


Uri,
you should know that better than prog x does not mean winning against prog x.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.