Author: Jeroen van Dorp
Date: 03:36:29 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 06:03:52, Larry Proffer wrote: >Mr Moreland, this is the Internet. A reader here has no idea at all whether or >not any poster is 'real'. It is quite conceivable that the person you refer to >is real, and you should stick to generalities rather than target in on some >specific case. Reason? Because this isuue is not about 'specific' cases, it is >more about patterns, or statistics, if you like. So you don't have a clue whether your coveted accusations are true or not. You don't really know if this specific case is part of your supposed pattern. Basically Bruce can't claim that he "seems real enough" but you can claim he's maybe part of a pattern of users who file fake complaints to get free upgrades for a cracked program. > >The pattern is that there are bunches of 'support' complaints about certain >companies occuring around the same time that those companies are releasing new >product. Now is Schwartz a part of that pattern? I think Bruce is right. If you suggest something, be clear about what you suggest. If you think Schwartz might be a freeloader, tell that. Don't say "I see so many fake complaints". J.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.