Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:52:54 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 10:16:52, Jorge wrote:
>On May 18, 2001 at 08:03:03, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>
>>Both using 16 mb hash.
>>
>>100 Games/10' side:
>>CMFun 51.5 Chessmaster16 48.5, (+34 =35 -31)
>>
>>100 Games/60' side:
>>CMFun 58.5 Chessmaster16 41.5 (+34 =49 -17)
>>
>>Games can be downloaded if wanted from my website
>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999
>>
>>Sarah.
>
>It appears that CM_Fun is better at longer time controls. I have CM_Fun in 4th
>place in a tourny using 5min/+2s time control, which is not bad either.
I wondered a couple of things about how you were running that tourney.
First CM8K only allows 8 players in round robin so how are you setting
the tourney up?. Second, why post a partial result of a tourney that would
take max 2 days to run?.
After seeing your post I started one myself at 5/2 and currently after
about 4 hours:
W D L Pts
CMFun 2 5 0 4.5
CMmg1 2 5 0 4.5
CMOctopus 1 5 1 3.5
CMNimzo732 3 1 2 3.5
CMTitan 1 4 1 3.0
CMOmega 1 4 2 3.0
Chessmaster16 2 1 3 2.5
CMFortress 0 5 2 2.5
I post this as simply an example as to how quickly it will finish.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.