Author: Peter Berger
Date: 12:07:16 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 14:54:07, John Merlino wrote: >On May 18, 2001 at 08:03:03, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>Both using 16 mb hash. >> >>100 Games/10' side: >>CMFun 51.5 Chessmaster16 48.5, (+34 =35 -31) >> >>100 Games/60' side: >>CMFun 58.5 Chessmaster16 41.5 (+34 =49 -17) >> >>Games can be downloaded if wanted from my website >>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >> >>Sarah. > >That's the same as my test, so we'll have results from 200 games, which is good. >I've finished the 100 games at G/10, and the result was as close as you can get: > >Chessmaster 50.0, CMFun 50.0 (+33 =34 -33) > >But, so far, out of 38 G/60 games, CMFun is leading 22.0 - 16.0 (+12 =20 -6), >so, once again, it appears that we have a personality that might be better at >the default at longer time controls. I'll let you all know when the G/60 games >are done. > >jm Do you assess bigger hashtables to Chessmaster when you are testing at G/60 - otherwise you maybe simply test the effects of the hashtables . pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.