Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:39:54 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 14:54:07, John Merlino wrote: >On May 18, 2001 at 08:03:03, Chessfun wrote: > >> >>Both using 16 mb hash. >> >>100 Games/10' side: >>CMFun 51.5 Chessmaster16 48.5, (+34 =35 -31) >> >>100 Games/60' side: >>CMFun 58.5 Chessmaster16 41.5 (+34 =49 -17) >> >>Games can be downloaded if wanted from my website >>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >> >>Sarah. > >That's the same as my test, so we'll have results from 200 games, which is good. Actually John, I had read your previous post and as I have two machines assumed I would be done before you had begun. It actually finished last night around 2 am. Thus far CMFun won all my 30 minute tourney's as well as this match. Could be that different settings cause minimal result changes at fast time controls. >I've finished the 100 games at G/10, and the result was as close as you can get: > >Chessmaster 50.0, CMFun 50.0 (+33 =34 -33) Yes very close. >But, so far, out of 38 G/60 games, CMFun is leading 22.0 - 16.0 (+12 =20 -6), >so, once again, it appears that we have a personality that might be better at Also very similar results %. >the default at longer time controls. I'll let you all know when the G/60 games >are done. Could it also be that at longer controls these personalities would out perform the default by even more?. CMFun clearly did better also against Deep Fritz in the admitedly few games I played. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.