Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 12:41:29 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 17, 2001 at 18:03:58, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >Little goliath speed above 2000 Knodes/sec in the first seconds > >2R5/8/8/8/7p/1k2q3/6P1/5Q1K b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by lg2000v3: > >70...Qe4 71.Qb5+ Ka2 72.Rc3 > +- (7.08) Depth: 6 00:00:00 33kN >70...Qe4 71.Qc1 Ka2 72.Rc4 Qe7 > +- (7.08) Depth: 6 00:00:00 33kN >70...Qe4 71.Qc1 Ka2 72.Rc4 Qe7 > +- (7.08) Depth: 7 00:00:00 106kN >70...Qe4 71.Qc1 Ka4 72.Rc4+ Qxc4 73.Qxc4+ Ka5 74.Qxh4 > +- (12.88) Depth: 7 00:00:00 106kN >70...Kb2 > +- (12.75) Depth: 7 00:00:00 106kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qa7 72.Rc2+ Ka3 73.Qa1+ Kb3 74.Rb2+ Kc3 75.Qxa7 Kxb2 > +- (9.67) Depth: 7 00:00:00 106kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qa7 72.Rc2+ Ka3 73.Qa1+ Kb3 74.Rb2+ Kc3 75.Qxa7 Kxb2 > +- (9.67) Depth: 8 00:00:00 883kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe5 72.Qc1+ Kb3 73.Qb1+ > +- (14.65) Depth: 8 00:00:00 883kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe5 72.Qc1+ Kb3 73.Qb1+ Is it just me, or is there something funny going on in the following timing vs kN: > +- (14.65) Depth: 9 00:00:00 1572kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe4 72.Qc1+ Ka2 73.Rb8 Qb7 74.Qc4+ Ka3 75.Rxb7 > +- (15.61) Depth: 9 00:00:02 1572kN At least a full second more, i.e. at least double the time, but no change in kN-count? >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe4 72.Qc1+ Ka2 73.Rb8 Qb7 74.Qc4+ Ka3 75.Rxb7 > +- (15.61) Depth: 10 00:00:02 4042kN More than doubled the count, but the time unchanged? >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe4 72.Qc1+ Kb3 73.Rc3+ Kb4 74.Qa3+ Kb5 75.Rc5+ Kb6 76.Qa5+ Kb7 >77.Rc7+ Kb8 78.Qa7# > +- (#8) Depth: 10 00:00:05 4042kN More than doubled the time, but the count unchanged? and so on... Do I misinterpret the numbers? >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe4 72.Qc1+ Kb3 73.Rc3+ Kb4 74.Qa3+ Kb5 75.Rc5+ Kb6 76.Qa5+ Kb7 >77.Rc7+ Kb8 78.Qa7# > +- (#8) Depth: 11 00:00:12 25116kN >70...Kb2 71.Qd1 Qe4 72.Qc1+ Kb3 73.Rc3+ Kb4 74.Qa3+ Kb5 75.Rc5+ Kb6 76.Qa5+ Kb7 >77.Rc7+ > +- (#8) Depth: 11 00:00:17 25116kN > >(Vinvin, 18.05.2001) > > > > > >On May 16, 2001 at 07:56:42, leonid wrote: > >>On May 16, 2001 at 03:01:45, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2001 at 21:27:53, leonid wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 2001 at 17:50:26, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>>> >>>>>On May 15, 2001 at 17:46:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On May 15, 2001 at 06:30:34, leonid wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Hi! >>>>>>> >>>>>>>If you would like to solve one simple mate then you have one. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>[D]1qbBBbq1/1Q5r/R2Nq1P1/2Q1N1n1/KQ2q1rk/2Q1N1n1/R2Nq1P1/1Q5r w - - >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Please indicate your result. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Thanks, >>>>>>>Leonid >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>My hardware is Celeron@875 Mhz !! >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>I found Goliath 2000 v2.8 a very very good mate finder ! >>>>>>is there a more recent version of Goliath ?? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Analysis by Little Goliath 2000 v2.8: >>>>>> >>>>>>1.Qxh7+ Qxh7 2.Ndf5+ Kh5 3.Nxg3+ Kh4 4.Qxh1+ Kxg3 5.N3xg4+ Q4d3 6.Rxe6 Qxb4+ >>>>>>7.Q5xb4 Qxh1 8.Nxd3 >>>>>> +- (16.90) Depth: 6 00:00:22 12540kN >>>>>>1.Qxh7+ Qxh7 2.Nef5+ Kh5 3.Nxg3+ Rxg3 4.Qxh1+ Rh3 5.Qcxh3+ Nxh3 6.g4+ Q6xg4 >>>>>>7.gxh7+ >>>>>> +- (18.00) Depth: 6 00:00:29 12540kN >>>>>>1.Nef5+ >>>>>> +- (18.11) Depth: 6 00:00:34 12540kN >>>>>>1.Nef5+ Kh5 2.Nxg3+ Rxg3 3.Qxh1+ Rh3 4.Qcxh3+ Qxh3 5.gxh7+ Qeg6 6.hxg8Q Qxe8+ >>>>>>7.Nxe8 >>>>>> +- (33.25) Depth: 6 00:00:56 12540kN >>>>>>1.Nef5+ Kh5 2.Nxg3+ Rxg3 3.Qxh1+ Rh3 4.Qcxh3+ Qxh3 5.gxh7+ Qeg6 6.hxg8Q Qxe8+ >>>>>>7.Nxe8 >>>>>> +- (33.25) Depth: 7 00:01:02 51270kN The above step is quite funny, again. Just curious. Heiner >>>>>>1.Nef5+ Kh5 2.Qxh7+ Qxh7 3.Nxg3+ Rxg3 4.Qxh1+ Rh3 5.Qhxh3+ Qxh3 6.gxh7+ Nf7 >>>>>>7.h8Q+ Bh6 8.Bxf7+ Qg6 9.Bxg6# >>>>>> +- (#9) Depth: 7 00:01:13 51270kN >>>> >>>>Do I understand correctly time? It is 73 seconds? Then NPS is 702 knps, that is >>>>very high even for selective search. Mine selective for the same position was >>>>282 knps. Computer 600Mhz. >>>> >>>>Do come Goliath with graphics, or it is just engin like Mate 2.0 ? Do we have >>>>this solver for DOS or for Windows, or for both? >>>> >>>>Cheers, >>>>Leonid. >>> >>> >>>Yes, goliath compute at speed above 1.2 Mnodes/s sometimes. >> >>Since this engin use hash, this 1.2 Mnps could be already some 1.5 Mnps without >>hash. Mine never went so far in selective. >> >> >>>It's a winboard engine, I use it under chessbase interface with the winboard >>>adaptator. >>> >>>You can find several version here : http://www.borgstaedt.de/ >>>follow the download link... >> >>Thanks!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.