Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:10:53 05/18/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 15:41:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I don't like the idea of a "static test" to trigger the SE test. Hsu's paper >explained the SE idea pretty clearly, and it is _obviously_ a dynamic >extension. >Not trying it unless some static condition is met seems a bit odd... why not >just use the static condition to trigger an extension, period, rather than to >test to see if an extension should be done... > >In DB, the SE test was done wherever it was reasonable to do it... Rather than >as the result of a static qualification test. Umm thats exactly what I said. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.