Author: leonid
Date: 05:13:18 05/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 23:56:01, Heiner Marxen wrote: >On May 17, 2001 at 13:34:19, leonid wrote: > >>Hi! >> >>If you would like to solve one mate then try this: >> >>[D]qr3rqB/3k3B/N1qqq1Nb/Q1n1n2Q/1qQ1Qq1Q/2RPR2Q/Q2K3Q/1q3q1b w - - >> >>Please indicate your result. >> >>Thanks, >>Leonid. > >Hmm, well. Since you didn't say that it is "very easy", not even mentioned >a simple "easy", I should have expected that: there is no mate in 10. >Chest on K7/600 with 350 MB hash needed 1.8 hours for this. The effective >branching factor from depth 9 to 10 is around 6, so I'm not sure that >I can go further than depth 11. To be continued... Hi! I already wrote my message when my connection was broken. Now will be very brief. This is position in 11 since you looked alread all 10 moves. I went only first 8 moves and it took 1 hour 56 min. My branching was not that good as your. It was very stable between 4 and 7 moves and was 9.5. Only between 7 and 8 it fell slightly to 8.3. Will try today to read somewhat from your program description for fun. Yesterday when I went to read few lines (it is not code but description that I am looking for) I had the impression that it was written on other planet. Nothing in commune! Nevertheless, very often I have the impression that our programs react in similar way for similar positions. Leonid. >Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.