Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Limited singular extensions. Anybody tried?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:47:55 05/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 19, 2001 at 02:38:37, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On May 18, 2001 at 23:21:07, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>No point in doing a SE if the singular move is a piece
>>attacked by the opponent at the previous ply (otherwise
>>the opponent could blow the search up any time it is
>>advantagous)...
>
>Any idea how to code this in Crafty? My code does not have
>this heuristic.
>
>--
>GCP


I will have to re-read the DT paper.  They did some tricks in this area.  I
think their fix was based on disabling certain moves while doing the SE test.
I'll try to find the paper and post an idea after I remember what they did.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.