Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Back to Shredder 5 and Kramnik

Author: Rajen Gupta

Date: 06:57:33 05/19/01

Go up one level in this thread


On May 19, 2001 at 09:25:28, Chessfun wrote:

>On May 19, 2001 at 08:14:07, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>
>>On May 19, 2001 at 07:19:14, Rajen Gupta wrote:
>>
>>>yep its entirely feasible-SMK and millenium about to divorce, so millenium uses
>>>its remaining contractual hold over shredder to prevent it from participating-if
>>>shredder had been successful at cadaques, it would anyway have played under the
>>>chessbase banner.
>>
>>Nothing suggests that SMK have been forced to relinquish anything related to
>>that tournament and it's unlikely that events are prohibited by contract, so
>>it's not entirely feasible. However, it is feasible that the qualifier caused
>>the split. One way or the other.
>
>
>That it itself is another possibility.
>
>I also wonder were Shredder a Chessbase program originally would they
>have gone along with SMK's point that Shredder was reigning World Champion
>and shouldn't need to play a qualifying event.
>
>Sarah.

i'm sure if shredder were part of chessbase, it would have taken part in the
qualification-one way or another the programmers need the marketing might and
the publicity machine of chessbase to succeed-irrespective of the result, the
match would have turned into a marketing opportunity for all programmes-even the
2 losing ones which would have been marketed as the alternative programmes which
were fully as strong as the winner, but lost due to the element of luck.

any way i now forsee a bright future for shredder

rajen



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.