Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:53:21 05/19/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 18, 2001 at 14:52:54, Chessfun wrote: >On May 18, 2001 at 10:16:52, Jorge wrote: > >>On May 18, 2001 at 08:03:03, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>Both using 16 mb hash. >>> >>>100 Games/10' side: >>>CMFun 51.5 Chessmaster16 48.5, (+34 =35 -31) >>> >>>100 Games/60' side: >>>CMFun 58.5 Chessmaster16 41.5 (+34 =49 -17) >>> >>>Games can be downloaded if wanted from my website >>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>It appears that CM_Fun is better at longer time controls. I have CM_Fun in 4th >>place in a tourny using 5min/+2s time control, which is not bad either. > > >I wondered a couple of things about how you were running that tourney. >First CM8K only allows 8 players in round robin so how are you setting >the tourney up?. Second, why post a partial result of a tourney that would >take max 2 days to run?. > >After seeing your post I started one myself at 5/2 and currently after >about 4 hours: > > W D L Pts >CMFun 2 5 0 4.5 >CMmg1 2 5 0 4.5 >CMOctopus 1 5 1 3.5 >CMNimzo732 3 1 2 3.5 >CMTitan 1 4 1 3.0 >CMOmega 1 4 2 3.0 >Chessmaster16 2 1 3 2.5 >CMFortress 0 5 2 2.5 > >I post this as simply an example as to how quickly it will finish. > >Sarah. Actually took longer than I thought 8 rounds at 5/2; For any interested this ended; 1. CMNimzo732 30.0/56 2. CMTitan 29.0/56 3. CMFun 29.0/56 4. Chessmaster16 29.0/56 5. CMOctopus 28.5/56 6. CMMg1 28.5/56 7. CMOmega 27.0/56 8. CMFortress 23.0/56 This will be posted at my website tomorrow with PGN. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.