Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 12:44:19 05/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2001 at 14:27:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On May 20, 2001 at 14:14:17, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>We have witnessed how simple it is for any IM or higher to paralize the tactical >>capability of any good chess program, by avoiding open positions which increase >>the tactical chances of most programs. Kramnik even paralized the tactical >>possibilities of Kasparov (one of the most dangerous human tactical player >>alive) by playing the Berlin system of the Ruy Lopez. Therefore, it is >>recommended to implement a subroutine which will enable Deep Fritz to detect >>when the position has become blocked by pawns, which will trigger it to >>sacrifice the key pawn, in order to open up the position for the program to >>excel tactically. A subroutine with this unique evaluation terms will require >>pawn hashing technique, since the extra evaluation terms will slow the search >>down more than the benefit of the extra knowledge. >> >>PS: Does anyboby know exactly the speed of each processor in which Deep Fritz be >>operated on, Will it be intel or AMD ? > >I guess that until this blocked pawns syndrome in Deep Fritz is corrected, it >won't matter much the speed of the hardware at all, plus the fact that Kramnik >will have the program for at least Three Long Months. >> >>Pichard. That was not really the question, i think that Fritz7 will run on a 8x1Ghz system, with 4-8GB ram. Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.