Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:32:00 05/20/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 20, 2001 at 21:21:28, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On May 20, 2001 at 21:04:04, Fernando Villegas wrote: > >>Of course Fritz and his father deserve a salute, but if we think that Gambit >>could have been the winner and it was not for the most microscopic margin; if >>then we think the altoguether differents conditions of work for Christophe, >>isolated in a far island where the best human player probably is not much better >>than me and where, althoug a nice place to live, you are far away of anything; >>if then you think that this man only recently is being supported by a company; >>if then you add that Gambit has not been in SSDF or in any other place for years >>after years but it is just a newcomer, then the conclusion is this: now that >>Gambit and his creator are inside the league, fully connected, fully in contatc >>with his colleagues, then I predict that Gambit has a far greater scope to grow >>and surely will do. Though respecting the genius of Frans, I dare to gues that >>in one or two years it will be Gambit the usual winner, the usual BIG Name, the >>thing to have and to play. >>Just an opinion from a fan. And yes, very humble. >>fernando > >Nah. Christophe is no newcomer at all, he is a vereran like Frans. Both have >tried everything in the universe for over 15 years. One is mr. Prune and the >other mr. Efficiency. Both have reached the limits of what is possible. I believe that they can improve their programs and they did not reach the limit of what is possible. <snipped> Talking >about potential, I say Imsomniac. I do not know because I believe that yace is even younger(I mean to the age of the program and not to the age of the programmer). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.