Author: stuart taylor
Date: 00:34:29 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 02:24:52, Christophe Theron wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 02:19:01, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>According to Rebel there is deep (multiprosessor) version of Tiger. So why >>didn't it play there :-) Now Fritz had a big hardware benefit. > > >I'm too busy at this time with Chess Tiger for Palm. The SMP code of Tiger has >to be "reactivated", as I have already explained. It wouldn't take long, but I'm >lacking time. > > > >>Second question: isn't normal Chess Tiger stronger than Gambit Tiger by all >>tests results? > > >The answer should be in the next SSDF list. > > > > Christophe I get the impression that that was true before the upgrades (by patch). But that now the situation is reversed. Which makes me happier, as it may indicate that the winning moves of Gambit Tiger are actually sound too, and wise, strategically. Or it might just mean that Tiger is an ingenious trouble maker. If my observation of results is indeed correct, that is. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.