Author: F. Jermann
Date: 01:41:09 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 03:34:29, stuart taylor wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 02:24:52, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On May 21, 2001 at 02:19:01, Jouni Uski wrote: >> >>>According to Rebel there is deep (multiprosessor) version of Tiger. So why >>>didn't it play there :-) Now Fritz had a big hardware benefit. >> >> >>I'm too busy at this time with Chess Tiger for Palm. The SMP code of Tiger has >>to be "reactivated", as I have already explained. It wouldn't take long, but I'm >>lacking time. >> >> >> >>>Second question: isn't normal Chess Tiger stronger than Gambit Tiger by all >>>tests results? >> >> >>The answer should be in the next SSDF list. >> >> >> >> Christophe >I get the impression that that was true before the upgrades (by patch). But that >now the situation is reversed. Which makes me happier, as it may indicate that >the winning moves of Gambit Tiger are actually sound too, and wise, >strategically. >Or it might just mean that Tiger is an ingenious trouble maker. >If my observation of results is indeed correct, that is. >S.Taylor All my results indicate that (at least at blitz) Gambit Tiger 2 aggressive may be a little bit better than Chess Tiger 14. Unfortunately, I think since GT 2 Standard is tested by the SSDF, CT 14 will be higher ranked. But who knows! My results a based upon about more or less 100 games / engine. Whas the Gambit Tiger in Leiden a Gambit Tiger Experimental or GT 2 (with which settings)?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.