Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 11:08:12 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 04:41:09, F. Jermann wrote:
>On May 21, 2001 at 03:34:29, stuart taylor wrote:
>
>>On May 21, 2001 at 02:24:52, Christophe Theron wrote:
>>
>>>On May 21, 2001 at 02:19:01, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>According to Rebel there is deep (multiprosessor) version of Tiger. So why
>>>>didn't it play there :-) Now Fritz had a big hardware benefit.
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm too busy at this time with Chess Tiger for Palm. The SMP code of Tiger has
>>>to be "reactivated", as I have already explained. It wouldn't take long, but I'm
>>>lacking time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Second question: isn't normal Chess Tiger stronger than Gambit Tiger by all
>>>>tests results?
>>>
>>>
>>>The answer should be in the next SSDF list.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Christophe
>>I get the impression that that was true before the upgrades (by patch). But that
>>now the situation is reversed. Which makes me happier, as it may indicate that
>>the winning moves of Gambit Tiger are actually sound too, and wise,
>>strategically.
>>Or it might just mean that Tiger is an ingenious trouble maker.
>>If my observation of results is indeed correct, that is.
>>S.Taylor
>
>All my results indicate that (at least at blitz) Gambit Tiger 2 aggressive may
>be a little bit better than Chess Tiger 14. Unfortunately, I think since GT 2
>Standard is tested by the SSDF, CT 14 will be higher ranked. But who knows! My
>results a based upon about more or less 100 games / engine.
>
>Whas the Gambit Tiger in Leiden a Gambit Tiger Experimental or GT 2 (with which
>settings)?
No, it was the commercial version. The one you have on your PC.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.