Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:09:22 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 14:04:40, Dann Corbit wrote: >On May 20, 2001 at 13:55:15, Theo van der Storm wrote: > >>1st International CSVN Tournament >> >>1. Fritz 8.0 45.5 >>2. Gambit Tiger 2.0 8.0 45.0 >>3. Diep 5.5 47.5 >> >>Congratulations to Frans Morsch and Mathias Feist, > >The PGN program (originally from your site) puts Gambit Tiger 2.0 first instead >of Fritz. Has there been some bug corrected in the program? This pgn is not fair. The opponents of tiger that did not play against Fritz scored 11.5 out of 26 games The opponents of Fritz that did not play against tiger scored 11 out of 24 games. 11/24>11.5/26 so it is clear that the opponents of Fritz scored better Comparison of only 11.5 and 11 is clearly unfair. If you do not include Celes ( I think that a program that gets 0% should not be included in the games of the opponents of tiger and Fritz for tiebreak decision) then Fritz's situation is even better. In this case we have 11/24>8.5/23 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.