Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 07:41:21 05/23/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 22, 2001 at 15:21:20, Graham Banks wrote: >On May 22, 2001 at 13:45:04, John Merlino wrote: > >>On May 22, 2001 at 12:17:23, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>Number of games played? >>>At what time control? >>>Only vs various CM8_personalities (worthless) or other top programs? >>>Kurt >> >>Worthless? >> >>Not to me.... But you already knew that. ;-) >> >>jm > >Not worthless to me either. It seems illogical that the strongest personality >eventually found would not also perform best against other programs also. This >will probably be shown in the long run. >Graham. Hi Graham Is it allowed no to have the same opinion? The CM8_Utzinger personality is not the strongest one when playing other CMP but it produced better resultats in numerous games against various [not CM8] top programs than any other CM8-personality. Why on earth have all the people with their own settings obviously not succeeded in obtaining better results? Or is it simply so that these people do not take the time to play on higher time controls enough games vs non-CM8-programs? I am still waiting for a better setting than CM8_Utzinger and am convinced there is more than one, but we [all the CM8-fans] need a prove on the basis of quite a lot of games. I am in so far desperated as it is quite impossible to do the whole work alone. Maybe a CM8_improvement_Accociation is founded where the single members are cooperating in testing the various settings. But the way things go so far, we shall never have reliable results. And for all these reasons I have stopped testing CM8 for a while if not even for ever. Kurt Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.