Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 06:47:52 05/24/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2001 at 06:39:05, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 24, 2001 at 03:48:44, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On May 23, 2001 at 16:04:35, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>1)I read in the past that you hoped to get rid of some preprocessing that you >>>did in Junior. >>> >>>Did you do it in Junior7? >>> >>>2)Is the new Deep Junior supposed to be better than the program that played >>>against Deep Fritz for the right to play against kramnik? >>> >>>3)Am I right to assume that Junior7 and Deep Junior are the same engine when >>>Junior7 is slightly faster for one processor when the only advantage of Deep >>>Junior is the possibility to use more than one processor? >>> >>>4)There are some cases when Junior is blind and cannot see simple things when >>>time cannot help. >>> >>>Did you get rid of it in Junior 7 and if not do you plan to get rid of the >>>problem in the future? >>> >>>Uri >> >>All programs are blind in some cases. >> Man I am banging for aslong as I post here on the game Nimzowitsch Alapin. > >I am talking about tactical errors and not about positional errors. > >I do not think that all programs are blind. >I agree that most of them are blind in some rare cases. >Some programs are blind because of null move problem and cannot solve some >simple mate in 2 problems but niot all null movers. >Junior is not a null mover but it has other problems. > >Uri The problems of Junior 6 are the same as from fritz6 if you mean with upwarded pawns on the kingsside. But junior is positionaly a litle stronger then fritz6 I also came to the conclusion that many times Juniors first games are not the strongest I tried some times an opening fritz6 versus Junior6 so no diferent choises could be made and manny times Junior played the second time stronger then the first time.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.