Author: Ed Panek
Date: 05:58:22 05/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2001 at 19:34:37, Ed Panek wrote: >On May 24, 2001 at 16:47:15, Graham Laight wrote: > >>On May 24, 2001 at 16:32:52, Günther Simon wrote: >> >>>This interesting position below happened in a match between F6 and ChessTiger14 >>>and it was a matter of some questions about the right access towards >>>the EGTBS by CT14 under CB GUIs in the CSS-Forum. >>>My Chessbase CT14 shows after some time a mate in 95! by Kf7 and Ncb8 >>>but testing it with the latest CB-Native Crafty18.08 the result given >>>by it was(around the same time as CT14) mate in 100!! >>>So now I am curious about the exact length of it in this position. >>>My first idea was to download the given 6piece at Bobs site but I had recognize >>>(with some disappointment;) that this special file does not exist there..uhuuhu >>>Maybe its because of the two pawns on one side in it and therefore it is on >>>the long long "not really urgent to do list"?! >>>If anyone knows about this file in the net please tell meeee! >>>Otherwise I would appreciate to know the naked truth about the length of >>>this mate as I could not sleep before knowing it :)) >>>But I strongly doubt anyone knows this <b>without</b> having that TB... >>[D]6k1/1P6/n1n5/P7/8/8/3K4/8 b - - 0 1 >>> >>>Regards, >>>Günther Simon > > >I am working on it now with H732 and all 345 Tb's..we shall see the answer soon > >hopefully! >Ed Well, I let Crafty and Hiarcs calculate for several hours. I think Crafty is better here actually. It stated mate in 99 as the fastest possible. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.