Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 08:56:17 05/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2001 at 10:02:57, David Rasmussen wrote: >The question is if I myself can resist the temptation :) Well, don't put any restraints on yourself for my sake :-). >At the moment it is identical to the released version, although I am thinking >about making some last-minute fine tuning. I really regard it as an archaic >program, compared with version 1.0 which I am probably working on. Probably working on? >If it wasn't for my exams, projects and reports that are due soon, I could have >added more or less the same evaluation to version 1.0 as is in version 0.88, >without too much hassle. This engine would certainly be a good deal stronger >than version 0.88, because of the opening book and the pondering and some other >things. Maybe it would be a better idea to use the 1.0 prototype. That is, if it is operational. But then again, if you want an impression of the eval in action it might be better to stick with the old 0.88. >But as Homer Simpson says: "When participating in sporting events, it's >not whether you win or lose, it's how drunk you get." I use that principle myself all the time. The amount of Guinness in my fridge reveals that. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.