Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 23:12:38 05/25/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2001 at 17:45:03, David Rasmussen wrote: >Yeah, I'm too drunk to know... > >No, really, it was a typo. I am _definitely_ working on it. That "probably" must >have slipped in there during one of my frequent beer-caused hallucinations. Don't worry about it. Everyone knows that beer-caused hallucinations spawns creativity :-). >It isn't at the moment, because it lacks complex evaluation. It still has a FICS >rating of about 2000 on my Celery 464 MHz. > >> But then again, if you want an impression of the eval in action it >>might be better to stick with the old 0.88. >> > >It's just that 0.88 plays better at the moment, because it has more than the >really basic evaluations terms that 1.0 has right now. That said, the evaluation >of 0.88 is still pretty weird, especially during the opening, which is a shame >since it doesn't have an opening book. I don't need to see it in action (well, I >have seen it in action many times), because it sucks :) Hehehe... Well, then it's all for fun then. Nothing wrong with that :-). >Damn, could you email me a couple? I would die for a Guiness right now. Let's hope that it'll be a feature of the internet sometime in the future. Just attach a tap to your cabinet and surf for alcohol. Not a good idea if you're addicted to the internet as it is now ;-). Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.