Author: José Carlos
Date: 01:04:49 05/26/01
I have a couple of suggestions. Let's see: I think we could agree a rule for next CCT's: use the classification of the previous edition as initial rating, and 'new' programs should always go after the 'veterans' of the tournament. This would sure make some 'unfair' seedings now and then, but it has the advantage of being an objective criterium (no discussion and therefore disagreement) and people would have just another reason not to miss it: keeping the position for the next edition seeding :) As this tournament is begining to become a classic, we could have kind of a rating of CCT. For example, we could give 15 points to the winner, 14 to the second and so on until 1 point for the 15th. Sum the points in the n-last editions and we'd have a CCT rating. Similar to F1 world championship. Winners of the tournament can get a title: ICC Master. So we have two ICCM's: Crafty and Shredder. More suggestions soon :) José C.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.