Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 03:25:49 05/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 25, 2001 at 22:28:51, enrico carrisco wrote: >>> >>>I only suggest so because the more attention this event grabs, the more willing >>>ICC will be to host it more frequently. >>> >>>-elc. >> >>Well, I don't have a permanent account, so I couldn't pay any chekels. Neither >>would I want to, to make ICC happy. I can't understand why this isn't on FICS >>instead. Just as good in any regard for this purpose, and there wouldn't be any >>fuzz about new accounts etc. > >The chekels would go to the GM, not ICC. > I understood that, but it _did_ say "I only suggest so because the more attention this event grabs, the more willing ICC will be to host it more frequently." And I have no interest in making ICC especially happy. Mind you, I have nothing against ICC as such, I just don't think it's better than FICS, and FICS is free. The only thing that FICS lacks, are the GM's and the IM's etc. And that's their choice. Of course, when all the GM's are at ICC, the new ones will also go to ICC.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.