Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 17:59:24 05/26/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2001 at 14:02:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 26, 2001 at 12:34:19, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >>I got a fail-high on Bxg7 after 80 hours, on a quad Xeon 450, but I didn't have >>time to resolve it. >> >>bruce > >It is interesting to know the reason that it failed high. > >Unfortunately programs only give main line. > >If you can make your program remember all the lines that it considered for more >than 1 minute than it will be interesting to know them. > >The number of these lines cannot be more than 80*60 in 80 hours and I am >interested only in the lines that begin with Bxg7. > >Uri The only information I could have returned is that Bg7 failed high, and for each possible response I could have remembered the move that refuted the response, and for ever possible response to the move that refuted each response, I could have remembered the move that refuted that move. You don't end up with a line when you have a fail high. You end up with something with a little less direction to it. I had to stop the test because round 1 of the CCT was starting. I'll run it again after the games tomorrow, I think. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.