Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:18:21 05/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2001 at 03:23:07, Harald Faber wrote: >On May 27, 2001 at 02:05:30, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 27, 2001 at 01:43:55, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>Hi Amir, >>>I have some information about a Junior X.4, dated March 27th this year. Played >>>very active but sacs pawns too often and unsound. Is the forecoming Junior7 a >>>later version, if so did you improve the engine since this mysterious X.4 and >>>did you fix this pawn-saccing or is this supposed to be fine play? :-) >>> >>>TIA for your answer! >> >>I believe that Junior7 is a better version. >>I guess that Amir did experiments in changing the evaluation function when the >>later version was not better but I know from the past that always the later >>commercial version was clearly better than the previous version. >> >>Junior5 was clearly better than Junior4.6 >>Junior6 was clearly better than Junior5 so I believe that Junior7 is clearly >>better than Junior6. >> >>Uri > >My intention is to find out the differences between Junior X.4 and commercial >Junior 7 and not between Junior 6 and Junior 7. So far the X.4 plays >significantly different than 6.0 and 6.0a. I understand it but I guess from your post that Juniorx.4 probably does not play better than Junior6 because it has some significant weaknesses that Junior6 does not have and if it is the case then Junior7 must be different than Juniorx.4 in order to be clearly better than Junior6. I do not know that Junior7 is clearly better than Junior6 but I guess it because of the fact that in the past Junior5 was clearly better than Junior4.6 and Junior6 was clearly better than Junior5. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.