Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 01:53:10 05/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 26, 2001 at 22:16:12, K. Burcham wrote: > > >a game posted here that deep shredder on dual 800's, lost to insomniac, >i cannot get my shredder5 (no patch), 1460 mhz 300 megs hash, 768 megs ram, >to make the same moves. > >for example move 11. the deep shredder played hxg4. Move JZInsomniac ShredderX ---- ---------------- ---------------- 1. e4 (0:01) c5 (0:04) 2. Nf3 (0:00) d6 (0:02) 3. d4 (0:00) cxd4 (0:02) 4. Nxd4 (0:00) Nf6 (0:02) 5. Nc3 (0:00) a6 (0:02) 6. Be3 (0:00) Ng4 (0:02) 7. Bg5 (0:00) h6 (0:02) 8. Bh4 (0:00) g5 (0:02) 9. Bg3 (0:00) Bg7 (0:02) 10. Be2 (0:00) h5 (0:02) 11. Bxg4 (0:00) hxg4 (0:02) 12. O-O (0:00) Bxd4 (0:02) 13. Qxd4 (0:00) f6 (0:02) 14. Nd5 (0:00) Nc6 (0:02) 15. Qe3 (0:00) Be6 (0:02) 16. Nb6 (2:47) Rb8 (0:02) 17. c4 (2:39) Kf7 (0:02) 18. Rad1 (2:28) Qg8 (2:11) 19. Nd5 (1:10) Rd8 (0:19) 20. b3 (0:55) Qg6 (4:11) 21. Nc7 (0:58) Bc8 (1:17) 22. Rfe1 (0:54) Rhf8 (0:57) 23. Qb6 (0:50) Ne5 (1:05) As you see it was all book moves they played. Shredder gets out of book at move 18 and could directly resign there. Best regards, Vincent > >my shredder5 wants to exchange bishops and attack the queen. >this move would be Bxg4. > >i thought maybe it would change to hxg4, but it never did. >the 1460 is probably searching about the same kns as the dual 800's. >during move 11, shredder5 was searching about 290 kns. > >after 10 minutes analysing move 11, shredder5 says the move deep shredder chose >is .5 worse than its choice. > >in other words deep shredder hxg4 -.5 > shredder5 Bxg4 .0 > > >and there are several other examples in this same game. > >how do we explain this? > >if deep shredder has the same search as shredder5, and if both programs search >the same number of nodes for move 11, then how do we explain this? > >thanks
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.