Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 01:54:35 05/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2001 at 04:26:37, Rafael Andrist wrote: >On May 26, 2001 at 17:32:13, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On May 26, 2001 at 17:02:19, James Robertson wrote: >> >>>Wow! This was a really cool. Insomniac has never before even drawn with Shredder >>>in a tournament game. >>> >>>Hardware: Shredder used a dual 800 to Insomniac's Athlon 1300mhz. >>> >>>James >>> >>>[Event "CCT3"] >>>[Site "chessclub.com"] >>>[Date "2001.05.26"] >>>[Round "3"] >>>[White "Insomniac"] >>>[Black "Shredder"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>>[TimeControl "2700+10"] >>> >>>1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 6. Be3 Ng4 7. Bg5 h6 8. >>>Bh4 g5 9. Bg3 Bg7 10. Be2 h5 11. Bxg4 hxg4 12. O-O Bxd4 13. Qxd4 f6 14. Nd5 >>>Nc6 15. Qe3 Be6 16. Nb6 Rb8 17. c4 Kf7 18. Rad1 Qg8 19. Nd5 Rd8 20. b3 Qg6 >>>21. Nc7 Bc8 22. Rfe1 Rhf8 23. Qb6 Ne5 24. Nd5 Nc6 25. Rd2 Rd7 26. Nc3 Qg7 >>>27. Rd3 Rfd8 28. Red1 Qf8 29. R3d2 Qg8 30. Qe3 Qh7 31. Nd5 Re8 32. Nb6 Rdd8 >>>33. c5 Qg6 34. Qe2 Kg8 35. Kf1 Kh7 36. Nxc8 Rxc8 37. cxd6 exd6 38. Qxg4 >>>Qxe4 39. Qd7+ Qe7 40. Rxd6 Kg7 41. Re1 Qf7 42. Qxf7+ Kxf7 43. Rd7+ Re7 44. >>>Rexe7+ Nxe7 45. Rxb7 Rc6 46. Ke2 Ke6 47. Rc7 Rxc7 48. Bxc7 Nd5 49. Ba5 Nf4+ >>>50. Kf3 Nd3 51. Ke3 Nf4 52. g3 Ng6 53. h3 Ne5 54. f4 Nf7 55. Kf3 Kf5 56. >>>Bd2 Kg6 57. fxg5 fxg5 58. Ke4 Nd6+ 59. Kd5 Nf5 60. g4 Ng7 61. a4 Ne8 62. b4 >>>Kf7 63. b5 axb5 64. axb5 Nc7+ 65. Kc6 >>>{Shredder resigns} 1-0 >> >> >> >>I am amazed by the number of pointless moves made by both sides in this game. >> >>Maybe it's because of the position. I should check with my own program, maybe it >>would also make these pointless moves. >> >>I guess strong chess players would have a good laugh if they browse thru this >>game. "And you need these thousands dollars computers to play like that???" :) >> >>No offense intended to Stefan or James. It's the kind of game that makes me >>think: "huh, I'd better work on better planning in Tiger, because maybe it would >>play similarly in that position". >> >> >> >> Christophe > >Computer Programs make often pointless moves. Humans do too (especially in >endgames with 5 or less pieces). The true art of chess is to make less pointless >moves than the opponent. Here Insomniac has done it fine. > > >Rafael B. Andrist Yes, I agree. Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.