Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 10:20:36 05/27/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 27, 2001 at 09:23:18, James T. Walker wrote: >On May 26, 2001 at 22:16:12, K. Burcham wrote: > >> >> >>a game posted here that deep shredder on dual 800's, lost to insomniac, >>i cannot get my shredder5 (no patch), 1460 mhz 300 megs hash, 768 megs ram, >>to make the same moves. >> >>for example move 11. the deep shredder played hxg4. >> >>my shredder5 wants to exchange bishops and attack the queen. >>this move would be Bxg4. >> >>i thought maybe it would change to hxg4, but it never did. >>the 1460 is probably searching about the same kns as the dual 800's. >>during move 11, shredder5 was searching about 290 kns. >> >>after 10 minutes analysing move 11, shredder5 says the move deep shredder chose >>is .5 worse than its choice. >> >>in other words deep shredder hxg4 -.5 >> shredder5 Bxg4 .0 >> >> >>and there are several other examples in this same game. >> >>how do we explain this? >> >>if deep shredder has the same search as shredder5, and if both programs search >>the same number of nodes for move 11, then how do we explain this? >> >>thanks > >The answer is simple. Deep Shredder is not the same program as Shredder 5 !! >Deep Shredder has some improvements over Shredder 5 and is according to my test >slightly stronger than Shredder 5 even on a single processor. I must add that >this time control does not favor either Shredder. Shredder gets better with >longer time controls and faster hardware. The difference between G/60 and >40/2hours is significant. This program seems designed to do one thing and >that's play very well at 40/2hours on a fast machine. JMHO >Jim The above is exactly my experience aswell! Regards Jonas
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.