Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT3 is over

Author: Peter Berger

Date: 05:33:19 05/28/01

Go up one level in this thread


I think the CCT3 was a great and enjoyable event ! The atmosphere was very
friendly and there were no debates this time .

A few ideas and suggestions for future events though:

a.) Every engine participating should be able to and do write logfiles . These
should be sent to some arbiter right after the game has been finished in case of
debates.

As far as I know every participant would have been able to do so ( for example
for the WinBoard programs the winboard.debug would be sufficient ) .

b.) Unknown programs

There have been a few unfriendly remarks about Searcher . This program was known
though and had competed on the servers for a while . So everyone interested
could have had a look at some  of its games before the tournament started . I
expected Searcher to do quite OK .

I am much more concerned about Butcher . This program was completely unknown and
never played any public games before the tournament . Please : I really don't
want to say anything bad about this program and its author  - I only think there
should be some general policy for cases like this one before the next CCT is
announced.

c.) Tiebreakers .

Before the tournament starts the rules should be clear . There was a little
discussion after the tournament about a tie-break between Fritz and Ferret .
With all of the opponents close together Buchholz or a similar system probably
would be fine - again I think this should be decided before the tournament
starts .

d.) Number of Rounds

8 rounds ( as any even number ) is not  a good number for a Swiss event . 5,7 or
9 ( odd ) are much better . Some expert for the Swiss system could explain
better than me . Main reason is the colour issue in the even rounds as far as I
remember .

e.) Manual Programs

To say it frankly : I think they should be forbidden for the CCTs . In this
tournament only SOS and Diep were manual ; for both programs automated versions
would have been availlable, too . Both operators are beyond any doubt - I am
100% sure they operated fair . It's just the potential for trouble with manually
operated programs I think should be avoided .

f.) GM/IM commentary

This was a brilliant feature - I really hope you'll keep it for future
tournaments.

g.) Contacting ICCA ?

I think the CCTs are great events and might be the future for computerchess
tournaments . Maybe the ICCA should be contacted so there could be an official
title to be earned there ?

Everything IMHO - of course .

pete



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.