Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book.

Author: Alan Grotier

Date: 15:46:27 05/28/01

Yes, all serious human chess players study standard and current openings and
each have their own preferences.
So,therefore a chess program must also have access to the same standard and
current openings which it will use to it's advantage: built in opening books.

Now, when a "quelconque" program wins because the loser was out-booked I start
to wonder which was really the strongest engine.

As a consumer,I would like to have no book comp.vs comp. results.
Then I would like the possibilty to add whatever opening book library
to the program of my preferance.

Salutations:Alain

• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Uri Blass 01:29:01 05/29/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 12:45:41 05/29/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 12:46:37 05/29/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Gregor Overney 21:46:57 05/28/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 18:45:52 05/28/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 16:42:37 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Daniel Clausen 09:03:05 05/29/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 18:42:57 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. José Carlos 07:23:22 05/29/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 14:29:10 05/29/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:29:52 05/28/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 14:50:28 05/29/01
        • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 14:59:18 05/29/01
          • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. stuart taylor 17:41:52 05/29/01
            • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Too complicated obviously! stuart taylor 17:56:13 06/05/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Günther Simon 17:15:40 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:33:31 05/28/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Mogens Larsen 09:32:15 05/29/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. william penn 05:19:14 05/29/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. william penn 17:13:55 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:36:19 05/28/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Peter Berger 21:34:43 05/28/01
        • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 21:53:31 05/28/01
          • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. José Carlos 07:37:06 05/29/01
          • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Uri Blass 01:36:43 05/29/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. stuart taylor 16:20:34 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 18:48:58 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. stuart taylor 17:22:33 05/29/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.