Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book.

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 16:42:37 05/28/01

Go up one level in this thread

Play 'em that way if you want to.

Silly to remove 80% of a program's strength.

But that's just my opinion.

• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Daniel Clausen 09:03:05 05/29/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 18:42:57 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. José Carlos 07:23:22 05/29/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 14:29:10 05/29/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:29:52 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Terry McCracken 14:50:28 05/29/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 14:59:18 05/29/01
        • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. stuart taylor 17:41:52 05/29/01
          • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Too complicated obviously! stuart taylor 17:56:13 06/05/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Günther Simon 17:15:40 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:33:31 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Mogens Larsen 09:32:15 05/29/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. william penn 05:19:14 05/29/01
• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. william penn 17:13:55 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:36:19 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Peter Berger 21:34:43 05/28/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 21:53:31 05/28/01
        • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. José Carlos 07:37:06 05/29/01
        • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Uri Blass 01:36:43 05/29/01

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.