Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book.

Author: william penn

Date: 17:13:55 05/28/01

Go up one level in this thread

On May 28, 2001 at 19:42:37, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Play 'em that way if you want to.
>
>Silly to remove 80% of a program's strength.
>
>But that's just my opinion.


 no way, most of your top programs today will make book moves even without an
opening book, unless you mean that the program saves time, which makes it
stronger, since it can use more time later to calculate the middlegame
positions, still i don't see this accounting for 80 percent of its strength.

• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:36:19 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Peter Berger 21:34:43 05/28/01
    • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 21:53:31 05/28/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. José Carlos 07:37:06 05/29/01
      • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Uri Blass 01:36:43 05/29/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.