Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book.

Author: Günther Simon

Date: 17:15:40 05/28/01

Go up one level in this thread

On May 28, 2001 at 19:42:37, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Play 'em that way if you want to.
>
>Silly to remove 80% of a program's strength.
>
>But that's just my opinion.


I think he has some point here but I won't do this because it makes
me eyesick to watch programs stagger blindly through singular
openings.
OTH I cant believe that you presume books build more than three
quarters of a program'strength -please tell me you were jokin'...

Günther

• Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Dann Corbit 20:33:31 05/28/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. Mogens Larsen 09:32:15 05/29/01
  • Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book. william penn 05:19:14 05/29/01

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.