Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 18:45:52 05/28/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 28, 2001 at 18:46:27, Alan Grotier wrote: > >Yes, all serious human chess players study standard and current openings and >each have their own preferences. >So,therefore a chess program must also have access to the same standard and >current openings which it will use to it's advantage: built in opening books. > >Now, when a "quelconque" program wins because the loser was out-booked I start >to wonder which was really the strongest engine. > >As a consumer,I would like to have no book comp.vs comp. results. >Then I would like the possibilty to add whatever opening book library >to the program of my preferance. > >Salutations:Alain I agree testing without books is a very good idea! Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.