Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:34:44 05/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2001 at 07:17:45, Mike S. wrote: >On May 29, 2001 at 03:47:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 29, 2001 at 01:16:23, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On May 29, 2001 at 00:58:44, Jouni Uski wrote: >>>>[D]r1b1Rbk1/pp3p2/2np3p/2qp2p1/3N4/1QPB3P/PP3PPB/6K1 w - - >>>>(Sorry if this is discussed already.) >>>>In this position Ferret played Ne6!!, which I found really stunning. (...) > >>>Ne6 is *grotesquely* superior in my book. > >>I believe that Ne6 is not GM style move. >>There is no reason to calculate complex lines of Ne6 when there is a simple way >>to win material and the games. >> >>I believe that GM calculate complex lines when they need them to win the game >>but they are smart enough not to do it when there is another simple way to win >>because the target in the game is to win and it is better to be more sure of >>winning. > >This may be correct from the practical viewpoint of a human master, but would >you like computers to play like that? It's not attractive... from a spectator's >viewpoint, I do not need that kind of smartness :o) > >>When you calculate a complex line there is a risk that you are wrong so it is a >>bad idea to do it when you have another good option. > >Hm... Fritz goes for Ne6 too. I posted some analysis of Deep Fritz that proved that Fritz did not go for Ne6 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.