Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not comp. vs comp. with no book.

Author: Daniel Clausen

Date: 09:03:05 05/29/01

Go up one level in this thread


Hi

On May 28, 2001 at 19:42:37, Dann Corbit wrote:

>Play 'em that way if you want to.
>Silly to remove 80% of a program's strength.
>But that's just my opinion.

Not sure what you mean with that. 80% of what? Of ELO-points? So the other 20%
are the engine itself? If Shredder with a good book has 2600 (just an example!)
ELO, my extremely bad engine with the same book would have 2080 ELO? (=80% of
2600 ELO) Surely not what you have in mind.. :)

What one could do is to make a (large enough) tournament with an engine w/o book
and compare the estimated ELO with the estimated ELO w/ the book and then
conclude that for this specific engine, playing w/o book means a decrease of X
ELOs. (I'm sure the decrease depends playing-style etc of the engine)

But "80% of program's strength" doesn't mean anything to me. (maybe it's just me
:)

Regards,

Sargon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.