Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 19:14:06 05/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 29, 2001 at 19:53:03, Pham Minh Tri wrote:
>
>[snip]
>>>>
>>>>In the case of the compiler used for Tiger 12 it was not the same. I was using
>>>>GCC for the DOS version and MSVC6 for the Windows version. I think that MSVC6
>>>>cannot produce DOS executables, correct me if I'm wrong.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Just a curious additional question: why do you support DOS when almost all
>>>computers nowaday are not installed it? You have not any historical problem,
>>>have you?
>>
>>
>>
>>Why do you think I am supporting DOS?
>>
>>Do I sell a DOS version of my program?
>>
>
>Sorry, I do not know. I did not buy/have any your excellent programs yet (sorry
>again :-) ). I just infer from your lines above ("using GCC for the DOS
>version").
The DOS version is the version I use "in the lab". It's easier for me to debug
the DOS version, and DOS allows more reliable timing measures than Windows.
The DOS version looks like the free text mode Palm version.
The commercial version is then compiled with a Windows compiler. The commercial
version runs under Windows.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.